# Preserve uncertainty across languages

Synthetic demonstration, not real research. AI-prepared and self-reviewed.

## English

Whether marker A contributes causally to response B remains unresolved. In three independent cell cultures, marker A was associated with response B; these observations do not establish causation. A separate pilot comparison of treatment C with control did not detect a difference (p = 0.20), which does not establish equivalence. We will perturb marker A and measure response B against a matched control. Replication, sample-size justification, facility access and applicable ethics requirements remain to be established before the proposed work proceeds.

## Japanese

独立した3つの細胞培養でマーカーAと応答Bとの関連を認めたが、因果関係は未検証である。別の予備比較では処置Cと対照の差を検出しなかった（p = 0.20）が、同等性を示すものではない。マーカーAを操作して対応する対照と比較し、応答Bを評価する計画である。反復数と試料数の根拠、施設利用条件および適用される倫理要件は、実施前に確定する必要がある。

Both retain association rather than causation, the null observation rather than equivalence, planned rather than completed perturbation, and unresolved feasibility. Independent bilingual review is not claimed.